At death's door, Thief Justice Rehnquist still a liar
Ailing thief justice defends lifetime terms as insulation from politics
By Sinclere Lee
WASHINGTON (BNW) You would think that someone as close to death as Thief Justice William H. Rehnquist would be trying to get right with God, but this fool continues to lie his way right to hell.
Rehnquist, ailing from thyroid cancer, defended lifetime appointments for judges last week as necessary to insulate them from pressures as they deal with politically sensitive issues. What a bunch of bullshit!
All he has done since he has been on the Court is let himself and the rest of the so-called conservative judges be pressured into dealing with politically sensitive issues. The 2000 presidential election that gave us stupid Bush is a case in point.
Rehnquist used the year-end report to address concerns about so-called activist judges and Congress' move to strip judges of some of their authority.
The 80-year-old wrote the report from home, where he has been recovering since announcing in October that he has cancer. He is on his way to hell an unrepentant fool.
Few details have been released about Rehnquist's illness, except that it is being treated with chemotherapy and radiation, a combination commonly used for an aggressive type of cancer. He has one foot in death's door and the other in hell's door. He has used to power of the High Court to stop every advancement of Black people in this country, and now tries to justify lifetime appointments to the rotten Supreme Court with a bunch of nonsense.
One thing about a liar like Rehnquist; he's not believed even when he telling the truth.
Rehnquist missed arguments in about 25 Supreme Court cases during November and December, but has said that he plans to swear in President Bush on January 20.
The thief justice mentioned his condition only briefly at the close of the 18-page report.
"On a personal note, I also want to thank all of those who have sent their good wishes for my speedy recovery," he said.
Rehnquist, who marks his 33rd anniversary on the high court next week, said that there has been "mounting criticism" recently of judges accused of interpreting the law to fit their politics.
Bush and Republican congressional leaders have been particularly outspoken about activist judges, especially those in gay marriage cases.
But Democrats also have also accused conservative judges of stretching the law.
Rehnquist said that judges should not be punished by Congress because of their decisions and that their lifetime tenure protects their independence.
"It is not a perfect system -- vacancies do not occur on regular schedules, and judges do not always decide cases the way their appointers might have anticipated. But for over 200 years it has served our democracy well and ensured a commitment to the rule of law," Rehnquist said.
Speculation has been rampant about when the Supreme Court will have its next vacancy. Generally justices retire in the summer when the court takes a three-month recess, but Rehnquist's health could force him to step aside sooner.
Supreme Court justices are appointed for life by the president and confirmed by the Senate. The average age of the current nine justices is 70.
An Associated Press poll taken in November found that six in 10 Americans support a mandatory retirement age for justices.
Roger Pilon, director of the Center for Constitutional Studies at the libertarian think tank Cato Institute, said justices and federal judges should be subject to term limits, perhaps 15 years.
"Anyone who has dealt with aging parents knows that age can be a problem," Pilon said. "There are justices on the court who, by their questions on the bench, suggest that they may not be up to the pace."
In his report, Rehnquist said that views on activism are subjective.
"Federal judges were severely criticized 50 years ago for their unpopular, some might say activist, decisions in the desegregation cases, but those actions are now an admired chapter in our national history," he said.
Rehnquist raised concerns that an already strained relationship between Congress and the federal courts has been exacerbated by criticism and suggestions of impeachment for judges "who issue decisions regarded by some as out of the mainstream."
In September, the House voted to prevent federal courts, including the Supreme Court, from ruling on whether the words "under God" should be stricken from the Pledge of Allegiance.
Last summer, the House voted to prevent federal courts from ordering states to recognize same-sex unions sanctioned in other states.
Rehnquist, in his 19th report on the federal judiciary since being named chief justice of the United States, also:
* Said that federal courts have cut employees and services to deal with budget problems.
* Called on Congress to add judges to overburdened courts, especially appeals courts in Boston, New York and San Francisco.
* Said he expects work to continue into 2005 by the panel he set up to answer congressional complaints that judges have been lax in policing themselves.